octoturgeandClaude Opus 5 3d907d0443 Confirm the light and the upload on a real P1P
Four things were shipped unverified because the printer was off when they
were written. Three are now confirmed first-hand (P1P, 2026-10-15), and one
is settled in the opposite direction from what was assumed.

**`set_light` had never once reached a printer**, and `completion::run`
blinks a finished print's chamber light with it. It works - but "accepted" is
not "it changed": `ledctrl` answers `result: "success"` as soon as the
command parses, exactly like the print-control verbs. So `lights_report` is
now modelled on `PrintReport`, which is the only read-back there is, and the
probe polls it rather than printing a reassuring message. Setting the light
on and off reads `[{"node":"chamber_light","mode":"on"}]` / `"off"` back,
about 3s later. The field was observed on v1 even though only the v2 schema
declares it.

**The blink itself works at the rate it ships at.** `completion::celebrate`
is now public so the probe runs the real function instead of a copy: twenty
`ledctrl` commands half a second apart, which a printer is entitled to
refuse. None were refused, it returned after 10.35s, and the light ended
`off` as specified - a blink that leaves the light on would look like a
printer still working.

**The firmware's own `flashing` mode is not the better option.** It is
accepted, and the reply echoes all four parameters back
(`led_on_time`, `led_off_time`, `loop_times`, `interval_time`), so the
printer does parse them. But `lights_report` never reports `flashing` - it
stayed on the previous mode for 12s of polling. A firmware blink is therefore
unobservable: nothing can confirm it happened or tell when it ended, while
the self-driven blink is built from a call that reads back. That is a better
reason to keep `celebrate` than the one in the comment it replaces, which was
that `loop_times` semantics were unconfirmed. Whether the light physically
blinks is still unwitnessed - nobody was watching the machine.

**Multi-MB FTPS upload works, and is slow.** A 4.96 MB project archive went
up with an exact byte count and came back byte-identical (sha256). But it
took 31.3s - about 0.2 MiB/s - so the 62 MB project already on that card
would take six and a half minutes. Anything that uploads a job needs a
timeout budgeted in minutes, not seconds. The claim in `download`'s comment
that these files are "a few hundred KB" is gone; the card disproves it.

Also adds `delete`, because the probe left a 5 MB file on a real SD card and
there was no way to remove it. One explicit path, no globbing: the convenient
version of this deletes something somebody printed from last week. Used to
clean up, and the card is back as it was.

New probe steps: `light on|off|flash`, `blink`, `upload <local> [name]`,
`delete <path>`. 51 tests still pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-15 22:23:41 +00:00

continuum-proxy

Edge gateway daemon for the Continuum print farm platform. Runs on a Linux SBC on-site, talks to printers over the LAN, and keeps a connection to the cloud control plane (continuum-backend).

What's real right now

  • Bambu MQTT - a real client for both protocol generations (MQTT v3.1.1+BambuMQTT v1 on older firmware, MQTT v5+BambuMQTT v2 on current firmware), auto-detected per printer on connect (a firmware update can move the same physical printer between them, so this isn't something config can hard-code once and forget - see printer/bambu.rs's BambuProtocolPreference::Auto). Request/reply correlation via sequence_id, an in-memory print.push_status cache that merges v1's partial updates and replaces on v2's full ones, and TLS trust that auto-pins a printer's certificate via trust-on-first-connect the first time the bundled CA doesn't verify (printer/bambu.rs's ensure_trusted) - see printer/bambu_mqtt.rs's doc comment for the full protocol write-up.
  • Marlin/RepRap serial - a real held-open serial connection that paces gcode lines by Marlin's own "ok" acknowledgment (printer/marlin_serial.rs).
  • Wire shapes from schemas, not hand duplication - Bambu's raw MQTT JSON is built straight from continuum-schemas' JSON Schema files via continuum-schema-instance, instead of a second hand-written copy of every request shape drifting out of sync with the schema.
  • Cloud uplink - a WebSocket client to continuum-backend that connects, sends a heartbeat on a timer, and reconnects on drop (src/uplink/).
  • go2rtc watchdog - restarts the camera-restreaming subprocess if it dies (src/go2rtc.rs).
  • Bambu file upload - implicit FTPS (port 990) into the printer's own cache/ directory (src/printer/bambu_ftps.rs, via BambuPrinter::upload_file). Confirmed live against a P1P on 2026-10-03: login, binary mode, and the transfer all work, byte count matched exactly.
  • Print status - print.push_status parsed into PrintReport with real job progress, temperatures, fans and HMS entries. Confirmed live on both generations (idle P1P on v1, H2C 20% into a job on v2); regression fixtures from those captures are in tests/fixtures/.

Examples worth knowing

  • cargo run --example live_reports [printer-id] - read-only, safe against a printer that is mid-print. Connects, reports firmware, and watches the status stream. Redirect stderr to capture raw payloads.
  • cargo run --example bambu_idle_checks -- <printer-id> - writes (FTPS upload, fan speed). Requires an explicit printer id and refuses to run unless that printer reports gcode_state: "IDLE".

What routes between the cloud and the printers

The uplink and the printer fleet are wired together, in both directions (uplink/mod.rs):

  • Up: every 5s, one PrinterTelemetry snapshot per printer that has reported, batched into a single Telemetry message. Verified live against a P1P and an H2C.
  • Down: a Command from the cloud is looked up by our own printer id, executed, and answered with a CommandResult. The set of commands is deliberately small - a fan speed and a single gcode line - and deliberately has no "start a print" variant; see PrinterCommand.

One quirk worth knowing: a Bambu on protocol v1 only sends a complete status when asked, so each telemetry tick also fires a pushing.pushall for the next one. A v1 printer's telemetry is therefore one tick behind, which is why it shows up on the second frame rather than the first.

What's still a stub

start_uploaded_file - the MQTT command that actually starts a print from an uploaded file - is written but has deliberately never been fired, since that commits a machine to hours of work. Its doc comment lists the three details to confirm on the first real attempt. upload_file is proven, but only with a small text file, not a multi-megabyte sliced .3mf.

PrusaLink (REST) and Klipper/Moonraker (WebSocket) - printer/prusa.rs and printer/klipper.rs just println! what they'd send. Also not built yet: local buffering for telemetry across connectivity gaps (so telemetry produced while the uplink is down is simply lost), LAN printer discovery (SSDP/mDNS), and the mechanical plate-changer interface.

Getting started

cp .env.example .env
cargo run                                  # the daemon: connects every configured printer, then runs the cloud uplink + go2rtc watchdog

cp printers.example.toml printers.toml     # fill in your real printers (gitignored)
cargo run --example auto_connect_bambu     # checks/auto-pins each Bambu printer's certificate, no MQTT needed
cargo run --example test_bambu_certs       # narrower: just the raw TLS handshake, no auto-pinning
cargo run --example printer_polymorphism   # standalone trait+enum demo, fake data, no network/env needed
cargo run --example bambu_commands_demo    # round-trips hand-written structs against real captured Bambu JSON

Structure

src/
  main.rs               Loads+connects the printer fleet, then runs the uplink and go2rtc watchdog side by side
  config.rs             Loads settings from environment variables
  fleet.rs              Loads printers.toml into ready-to-use PrinterHandles
  uplink/                WebSocket client to continuum-backend: connect, heartbeat, reconnect on drop
  go2rtc.rs             Restarts the go2rtc camera-restreaming process if it dies
  printer/
    mod.rs               GenericPrinter trait + PrinterBase + PrinterHandle enum - the trait+enum
                         "inheritance" pattern this project uses instead of class inheritance
    bambu.rs             The real Bambu printer type: cert trust, protocol version auto-detect, commands
    bambu_mqtt.rs        The real MQTT wiring underneath bambu.rs - see its doc comment for the protocol details
    bambu_commands/      Hand-written serde structs mirroring continuum-schemas' bambulab/ shapes
    marlin_serial.rs     A real held-open Marlin/RepRap serial connection
    prusa.rs, klipper.rs Still stubs - see "What's still a stub" above
examples/
  auto_connect_bambu.rs   Checks/auto-pins every Bambu printer's certificate (no MQTT)
  test_bambu_certs.rs     Narrower: just a raw TLS handshake per Bambu printer
  printer_polymorphism.rs Standalone trait+enum demo, five fake printers, no network needed
  bambu_commands_demo.rs  Round-trips bambu_commands' structs against real captured Bambu JSON

printers.toml (gitignored - copy from printers.example.toml) holds real per-printer connection details: host, access code/API key/serial port depending on vendor, and - for Bambu - an optional per-printer CA certificate override (see certs/README.md; most printers don't need one, since connect() auto-pins automatically).

Learning Rust through this repo

src/printer/mod.rs's doc comment is where the "how do I do inheritance without classes" question lives - trait (shared behavior) + struct (shared fields) + enum (the closed set of concrete types), instead of GenericPrinter -> BambuPrinter/PrusaLinkPrinter/... class inheritance. Run printer_polymorphism to see it work end to end without needing any real printer on the network.

S
Description
Continuum platform: continuum-proxy
Readme
914 KiB
Languages
Rust 100%