Send the Supabase token the app already had

Auth is Supabase end to end and always was: the backend verifies access
tokens asymmetrically against the project's published JWKS and holds no
signing key of its own, and `requireUser` wants that token in
`Authorization: Bearer`. Nothing about that needed changing.

What was wrong is only here. The two REST calls forwarded
`useRequestHeaders(["cookie"])`, which is what you do when a Nuxt server
is proxying a browser's request - and this app sets `ssr: false` so the
same static bundle can serve the browser and the Tauri shell. There is no
server to forward anything, so the header arrived empty and every call
should have been getting a flat 401.

The token was to hand the whole time. `stores/telemetry.ts` has been
reading `session.access_token` for its socket since it was written; the
REST side simply never did.

`useApiFetch` is now the one way this app calls the backend, and it reads
the token inside the fetcher rather than capturing it at setup, because
supabase-js refreshes the session in the background about once an hour - a
captured token would work until it quietly stopped. With no session it
omits the header entirely rather than sending an empty Bearer, which the
backend rejects with a message about the header's shape and reads like a
client bug; getting the user a session is the Supabase module's redirect's
job.

The socket keeps using a `?token=` query parameter, which is not an
inconsistency: a browser WebSocket cannot set request headers.

`nuxt typecheck` clean.
This commit is contained in:
2026-10-15 23:21:01 +00:00
parent e928fcf658
commit a558156968
3 changed files with 53 additions and 13 deletions
+43
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
/**
* The one way this app calls `continuum-backend`.
*
* Auth is Supabase throughout: the backend verifies access tokens
* asymmetrically against the project's published JWKS and holds no signing
* key of its own (`continuum-backend/src/auth/verifier.ts`), and
* `requireUser` wants that token in `Authorization: Bearer`. So this attaches
* it, and that is the whole of the client's side of authentication.
*
* What this replaces: `useRequestHeaders(["cookie"])` on each call site.
* Forwarding a cookie is what you do when a Nuxt *server* is proxying a
* browser's request, and this app sets `ssr: false` so that it can ship the
* same static bundle to the browser and to the Tauri shell - there is no
* server to forward anything, so the header arrived empty and every call got
* a 401. The token was already to hand the whole time; the telemetry store
* has been reading it for its socket.
*
* The token is read inside the fetcher rather than captured when this is
* called, because supabase-js refreshes the session in the background about
* once an hour. A token captured at setup would work until it quietly
* stopped.
*/
export function useApiFetch() {
const config = useRuntimeConfig();
const session = useSupabaseSession();
return <T>(path: string, options: Parameters<typeof $fetch>[1] = {}) => {
const token = session.value?.access_token;
return $fetch<T>(`${config.public.apiBase}${path}`, {
...options,
headers: {
// Omitted rather than sent empty when there is no session. An empty
// Bearer is a malformed credential the backend rejects with a
// message about the header's shape, which reads like a client bug;
// no header at all is the honest "not signed in". The Supabase
// module's own redirect is what handles getting the user a session.
...(token ? { Authorization: `Bearer ${token}` } : {}),
...options?.headers,
},
});
};
}
+4 -4
View File
@@ -21,7 +21,8 @@ export interface PrinterStream {
* in: the caller needs one of these per printer, discovered from a list that
* itself arrives asynchronously, and Nuxt's data composables may only be
* called while a component is setting up. A loop over a resolved list is not
* that.
* that. It takes the fetcher as an argument for the same reason - the caller
* builds it in setup, where `useApiFetch` is valid.
*
* **Absence is the normal case, not an error.** Only Bambu's X1/H2 class
* publishes a camera URL a gateway can restream; a P1 or A1 reports that it
@@ -35,12 +36,11 @@ export interface PrinterStream {
* for anyone else.
*/
export async function fetchPrinterStream(
apiBase: string,
apiFetch: ReturnType<typeof useApiFetch>,
printerId: string,
headers: Record<string, string>,
): Promise<PrinterStream | null> {
try {
return await $fetch<PrinterStream>(`${apiBase}/printers/${printerId}/stream`, { headers });
return await apiFetch<PrinterStream>(`/printers/${printerId}/stream`);
} catch (err: unknown) {
// A 404 means "this printer has no watchable camera", which is expected
// often enough that treating it as a failure would put an error state on